This base finished with 8 modules and 9 corridor cells, including 1 greenhouse module, 1 water module and 1 utility module. Connecting 100% of modules to the habitat is a clear layout strength: most installed equipment had a route into the base network. Protective modules accounted for 20% of module cost, showing a meaningful commitment to resilience, although this alone does not prove redundant delivery. The average geometric distance from a greenhouse to its nearest water module was 8 grid steps. The comparable distance to a utility module was 3 steps. Shorter distances can simplify a design, but distance alone does not show whether a corridor is connected, has enough flow capacity or survives a hazard.
The layout's weak point should be judged against what happened during operation: average water reserve was 31.05, and 0 crisis events were recorded. The water margin was less obviously constrained, but individual turns may still reveal a bottleneck. Compare the map with the operation and incident timelines to see whether a single corridor or utility was repeatedly stressed. In the next mission, retain the same crops and care settings while changing one connection or adding a backup route; compare delivered resources, harvests and crisis turns. This is a diagnosis of the simulated network and its observed outcomes, not proof that the same geometry would work on the Moon.
Distances are geometric. Follow the replay to inspect actual connections and turn results.
BASE LAYOUT / COMPLETELevel 1 · turn 10
26 / 26
Selected moment
Level 1 · turn 10
No actions queued; turn ended
Incident: power · severity 1.2
Power
28.2
Water
27
Oxygen
65
Food
45
Crop yield
34
Meat yield
16
Accepted player commands
Operation log
Select an entry to show the base immediately after that step. Minigame input proofs are omitted from the readable log.